About Me

Name:Katie Favazza
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

HamNation: Do Pundits Matter?

Check out my video skills on today's episode of HamNation.



You can't imagine how much fun Mary Katharine and I had making this video. We even got kicked out of one store and the mall in general!

I love my job.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

White Flag Republicans good for GOP?

From David Hill's column, "Seventeen dissenters good for GOP," in The Hill:
It speaks volumes the some Republicans feel so strongly about their principles that they chose to walk the hard path of defecting. It says that Republicans think. It says that Republicans listen to the people they represent. It says that Republicans are principled. It says that Republicans stand their ground even when it’s tough. These messages benefit all Republicans.
Hmm. I wonder what The Victory Caucus would have to say about that.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How to increase your political and general intelligence

Reading Peggy Noonan will make you smarter. My big brother Anthony taught me that a long time ago.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Learning from our presidential preferences

What does the "composite" of a great president look like? Look no further than a 2007 Gallup poll.

David Shribman writes:

We need the fearlessness and fortitude, and the genuineness and gentleness, of Lincoln, who spoke in biblical cadences while prosecuting a bloody war to restore the Union -- even as he invented a new country and grafted the idea of equality, which was not in the Constitution or even in his own early worldview, onto the American mind. We need the optimism of Reagan, who was brave enough to see morning in America and then persuasive enough to breathe a new, fresh dawn onto a weary country.

We need the resolution of Kennedy, who dared to believe Americans might be idealistic again and who, in life and then in tragic death, gave America reason to be idealistic. We need the dauntlessness of Bill Clinton, who had the bravery to embrace ideas his own supporters reviled and the valor to transform diversity from an American burden to an American advantage. We need the resolution of Roosevelt, who dared to believe America could prevail in a world beset by depression and, worse still, by despots.

[...]Find the candidate for 2008 who has [courage], and you might find the man or woman whom Americans will select to be the next president. We should be so lucky.

I encourage you to read the rest of the column here.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Investigative blogging...

Newt's YouTube challenge has disappeared from YouTube.

Today, when I clicked the link--in search of a few entries--I was disappointed. YouTube said: "This video has been removed by the user." Why would Newt remove his own challenge? Hmm. Made me think.

A few minutes later, I was at HotAir.com and watched yesterday's episode of Vent. In it, Michelle Malkin states that when her videos have been removed (presumably for being "inappropriate"), the same error message appears.
"Our anti-jihad and YouTube censorship videos have been pulled and falsely labeled as being 'removed by the user.' Well, we would like to inform YouTube users that this information is false, wrong, and untrue. We didn't remove our own videos. You did. We'd also like to request that YouTube correct the record."

So now I'm curious.

Was Newt's challenge deleted by YouTube?

By the way, in case you missed it, the challenge was "to create a two-minute YouTube video that easily explains why Free Enterprise is best for America." What a scandal, eh?

UPDATE 3:46pm: Not a scandal at all, apparently. Here's the correct link and you can watch the video below. WHEW. If someone censored my buddy Newt, I was going to get angry...


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Earning my keep

Exhibit A.

Exhibit B.


Despite appearances, I promise I do more at Townhall than just send funny YouTube videos to Mary Katharine...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"No Way to Elect a President"

Things are heating up way too early for the 2008 election.

Regarding schedule conflicts of various candidates and the Iraq vote last week, David Broder writes:
Joe Biden and John McCain were both supposed to spend the day in Iowa; Hillary Clinton, in New Hampshire; Chris Dodd, in South Carolina; Barack Obama, in South Carolina and Virginia; and Sam Brownback, in Florida.

It's only February of 2007, but from the schedules these presidential hopefuls -- and their rivals -- are keeping, you would think the primaries were almost upon us. Plenty of campaign consultants were aggravated that Reid was inconsiderate enough to let a little matter such as the Iraq war intrude on their important work of getting their candidates elected -- next year.
He continues:
The Democrats are mostly to blame for this mad rush to judgment, but neither party has tried seriously to apply the brakes. Their indulgence of this breakneck competition among the states means that someone is likely to put a death grip on each party's nomination before most Americans have begun to size up his or her capacity to be president. The second consequence is a numbingly long general election campaign: a nine-month marathon that leaves contenders and voters exhausted.

It also drives the cost of the election right through the ceiling -- and makes the candidates spend untold hours courting those with the wealth to finance their campaigns. Serious students of the process proclaim this to be the first billion-dollar election and predict the old system of partial public financing, with its spending controls, will be shattered to bits by the runaway money chase.
I highly recommend that you read the rest of the column here.

Everything today is happening sooner, costing more, and frankly, wasting time. I overheard someone today say that 99% of what's on the blogs is trivial--that even if it matters today, it will be forgotten tomorrow. In many cases, I think that's true.

Edwards' bloggers made news that resounded beyond the blogosphere when they crossed the line with their anti-Catholic comments, but will anyone besides bloggers remember in a month or two? I'd bet not.

Will McCain's trip to California to hold hands with the tree-loving Governator matter to anyone by June? I'm not convinced it will have a long-term impact on his appeal in The Golden State or anywhere else for that matter.

The problem is, of course, that the candidates are already racing to the finish line--and the old and new media alike have no choice but to jog alongside them. So what's an everyday citizen to do?

Take a deep breath. Read/watch/listen to the news and the pundits of your choice. But remember that it's still early and you'd be a fool to think what's in the paper or on YouTube/the blogs/the radio today is the end-all, be-all for the not-so-upcoming election.

That said, I'm off to go read more about what these clowns are up to... and you'll be hearing more about it whether you like it or not.

Sigh.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Warming" up to McCain?

From Jon Fleischman:

Last year, one of Arnold Schwarzenegger's lurches to the ideological left that most infuriated GOP leaders and activists around California was his calling for the passage of Assembly Bill 32, dubbed by the environmental-extremist community as the "Global Warming Solutions Act" -- legislation which has called for increasing regulations in California to fight an alleged nexus between human action and global climate change (read what William Rusher has to say about this in today's featured Golden Pen column).
 
Apparently John McCain doesn't know, or doesn't care that this legislation that McCain heralded yesterday at an appearance with Governor Schwarzenegger was that only one Republican legislator, a moderate from San Diego, out nearly 50 in the State Capitol, voted for this ill-advised legislation. 
 
Then Assembly Republican Leader George Plescia best summed up virtually unanimous legislative Republican opposition to Senator McCain's new favorite bill by saying, "...the measure will establish the largest taxing bureaucracy in California since the creation of the State Board of Equalization, giving unaccountable state Air Resources Board members the ability to take "discreet" action - such as increasing the state gas tax by $1 or more - to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in California.  Even worse, the measure will do nothing to lessen the impact of emissions generated in China, Mexico or other emerging economies, whose environmental damage has been far greater than anything that has occurred in California." (You can read all of Plescia's remarks on AB 32 here.)

Click here to read the rest of this column.

See also:
Senator McCain in California
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy birthday, Cpl. M!

Happy birthday, Cpl. M!

Thank you for your service to our nation--and to the blogosphere! haha...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Who am I? Why am I here?"

Fantastic article from the editor in chief of The Hotline:
Edwards and Romney have a lot in common. They rose to national prominence due in part to their good looks, ability to communicate and electoral success in states where their respective parties have struggled (North Carolina and Massachusetts). Both have had relatively little electoral experience and have used their previous successes in business and law to fill in the blanks.

The problem for both is that as they try to become perfect ideological creatures in order to win their primaries, they are damaging the personas that gave them national stardom in the first place.

Lucky for those of us who are leaning toward supporting Romney at this point can take solace in the fact that it is still very early. I just hope Romney's staff is listening.

(Thanks for the link, Frank.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sigh... You win this time.

Maybe McCain isn't a flip-flopper afterall. Trust me, I didn't want to read it either.

All's fair in love and YouTube-war.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is Bush's plan for when Osama is in custody?

Bush, on what he will do when he finds Osama: "I will screw him in the a**!"

I'm with The Political Pit Bull on this one:

but, personally, I find it endearing. Obviously, I'm glad he doesn't speak like that in public but it's nice to know that privately he's hopping mad. And I know he's long since taken to saying that no one person matters and it's about disrupting the networks, but I have to wonder how much it burns him personally, every single day, that OBL's not dead or in custody yet.

Ha! Thank you for that, Ace.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"We need the U.S. Army here."

The newest from Bill Ardolino... courtesy of Michelle Malkin.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The (D) Stands for Defeat"

GOP and College hits the nail on the head.
"Now more than ever: The (D) Stands For Defeat."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Isn't she lovely, this Hollywood girl?

Thanks for the link, MKH.

Watch both videos and laugh till you hurt.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »